[isatrader]

I agree that $22.50 is the breakout although there was a earlier breakout @21 that didn't work out (alhough it is perhaps a healthy pull back!?).
On the other hand, entering @18.33 gives a SL with low risk. Perhaps for a first partly position. I don't agree fully about the relative strength. I see a basing area on the P&F relative strength (trend) chart (WIX vs SPXEWI).
This is how I look at it (+ = pos, - = neg):
+ Sector Internet is improving (bullish percent is bull confirmed, positive trend of stocks in sector is on bull alert, the amount of stocks whose RS chart is in a column of rising Xs in this sector is improving...)
+ Sector is moving up in the sector bell curve
+ Sector still unfavored but improving
+ Sector ranks #12 out of the 40 DWA sectors
+ P&F price chart broke the blue dotted bullish resistance line or BRL (normally acts like a brick wall!)
+ Since breaking that BRL, we saw higher bottoms on the trend chart
+ Large base forming at the level of $17-17,5

+ Price objective horizontal count P&F chart = (18*0.5*3)+14.5 = $41,5
+ Price objective vertical count P&F chart = [(7*0.5)+(2*1)]*3 + 17=$33.5
+ Default RS chart WIX vs SPXEWI is bottoming. A faster RS chart shows a basing area and buy signals
+ The one box reversal chart on stockcharts shows a large base and full fulcrum @21. Actually on a pull back.

- After the $21 breakout, the stock didn't continue to rise on the P&F chart. This indicates possible weakness in the fulcrum pattern
- If the stock falls below $18, it shows weakness.
* Stoploss traders $16.89 (IR = 8%) , stoploss investors $13.81
* When one waits for the breakout @22.50, I think a good stoploss is $19.61 (IR = 13%)
In other words, I think this is worth partial buying. My reward to risk is between 10 and 16, depending on the price objective I use (see my buy decision tabel).

Imagine a portfolio of $100.000:


Questions
- Can somebody post a sector chart for Internet as mentioned in Weinstein's book page 78? I do have the information but it is all P&F based. I would like to make a comparison...
- Doesn't the former breakout @21 qualify for a stage 2 breakout? Not enough volume perhaps...

I don't disagree with the analysis, but remember we are talking about Weinstein's method on here exclusively, and so my point was that it breaks the rules of the method currently and would need to show numerous technical improvements to become what the method considers an A+ buy candidate.

For example it breaks a number of Stan's Don't Commandments (page 129 in the book) which Stan says you should never violate. As firstly, it closed back below it's 30 week MA last week, which breaks the Don't Commandments. It had poor volume characteristics on the initial breakout attempt, and is not even at a breakout point currently, so breaks the Don't Commandments. It is showing poor relative strength currently, as the relative performance is below the zero line still, and has been declining below it for the last three months while the market has broken out. So it's not showing the strong out performance required for the method currently. Another rule break is that it is still below heavy near term resistance as it's still in Stage 1 - see weekly Ichimoku cloud for visual on this. And finally the last commandment it breaks is to not guess a bottom, as the method says you must buy on breakouts above resistance, whereas it's currently closer to breaking down than breaking out.

So imo it breaks 5 of the 9 Don't Commandments currently, which means it's too early to consider if you are following the methods rules, but one to watch for if the technicals improve. Obviously, if you are not following the methods rules, then sure it has a low risk reward and is attempting to base in Stage 1 still after a failed weak volume Stage 2A breakout attempt in November, which saw it fall back into Stage 1 once more, and redefined the top of the Stage 1 range at 22.50.

But the reason I commented on the post is to highlight to anyone new to the method, that it's earlier than the methods entry points and hopefully I've explained why in this post.

So my intention is not to disparage you if you have taken it as a trade. I'm just highlighting that it breaks the methods entry rules in it's current position for anyone newer to the method reading this so that they can learn the method. But it wouldn't take much for it to improve technically, and so makes a good watchlist candidate for when it does. But for the time being it gets a Stage 1- rating imo, unless it can break above the short term downtrend line and make a weekly closing higher high, at which point it would be more suitable for partial accumulation buying under the methods rules.