[pcabc]

I had a question which I haven't managed to find an answer to in the book: if there are more suitable candidates than my portfolio size allows, how should I best rank the candidates I've found ? The ones that have the nearest consolidation base, thereby giving a better R:R ? Those with the highest relative strength ? Or in the sectors with the highest relative strength ?

There's a number of criteria one could use when there are "too many" opportunities, and it's probably partly down to personal preference but did Stan shed any light on this ?

My understanding from the book was that you considered all aspects and then pick the best over all.